Untitled Short Story: First Installment
31-Oct-05
The major newspapers around the world had all covered the story, but it had barely earned a slot in the bottom half of the front page and some papers had relegated it to the fourth or fifth pages. On television the story was given even less coverage. The local network news stations had all waited until the end of their broadcasts and announced it the same way they had years before announced the outrageous accusations that the 1969 moon landing was faked. Cable news had first ran the story in segments that were always named something like “Health Watch”, but after the first day you could only find it in the scrolling bar at the bottom of the screen: “Sweedish scientists annunce that dead bodies still feel pain”. Typographical errors were common in these scrolling marquees whose content had to be changed by the minute by an over-worked intern.
Instead, the news of the week had been mostly devoted to the leak of a White House Memo that hinted at the disdain of a junior senator by a senior staff member on the eve of important legislation with international impact. The cartoons and editorials reflected the story’s prominence with one cartoon depicting the White House staffer sweating and nervously attempting to hide a giant elephant from the entire Senate whose members looked on, angrily tapping their feet. Throughout the week there were no cartoons about the scientific breakthrough from Sweden.
National Public Radio had a penchant for such stories and did not hesitate to assign its best audio essayists to the story. But for the first few days they only focused on how the scientists came to their conclusions, how the experiments had gone on for twenty years and how the scientists, still uneasy with their findings, had secretly enlisted other scientists all over the globe to corroborate the results before they were ever published.
Dr. Ingrid Lennartsson said in her speech at Linkoping University, “We feel at this time that is in the best interests of humanity that this discovery be announced to the world and that our society must accept this knowledge and reflect it in all of our customs and rituals surrounding the event of death.”
On Sunday morning most church sermons ignored the discovery. But that afternoon on NPR the first thoughtful commentary on the subject was broadcast. Dr. Hermann Lizst of the Cornell University Department of Religious Studies had recorded an essay that did not give the discovery full credit, but treated it merely as a “what if?”.
“If our bodies could remain conscious of sensations for hours or even days after the moment of death,” he said, “then we would have a moral obligation to drastically alter the way we handle our dead. Autopsies, embalmings, perhaps even burials and cremation would be out of the question. But how would we treat the deceased? How could we ensure a painless afterdeath? How could we know how long a person will be able to feel pain after death?”
…to be continued.
Who’da thought they’d lead ya, back here where we need ya! You can now (once again) access this site at 