Comments on: setting the record straight about robuts http://probabilityfields.com/2007/02/02/setting-the-record-straight-about-robuts/ aspiring TV writer. screenwriter. director. musician. statesman. Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:19:21 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: G http://probabilityfields.com/2007/02/02/setting-the-record-straight-about-robuts/comment-page-1/#comment-135 G Thu, 15 Feb 2007 04:29:09 +0000 http://probabilityfields.com/2007/02/02/setting-the-record-straight-about-robuts/#comment-135 Robuts may destroy man for his mistakes time and time again, and man may even destroy himself, but what I see as being the human spirit, is a willingness to progress. The robut in his cold rationality doesn't work in real universals. The robut can't forgive. The most simple and rational conclusion, is that if an error is made, debug it, don't destroy the computer / host. This is why true reason is only applicable by the human being. Trial and error, leading to a just and universally fruitful end is purely rational. Being able to admit to the potential of mistake and then fixing the inevitable mistakes themselves, is the only reasonable solution. Great post! "G" Robuts may destroy man for his mistakes time and time again, and man may even destroy himself, but what I see as being the human spirit, is a willingness to progress. The robut in his cold rationality doesn’t work in real universals. The robut can’t forgive. The most simple and rational conclusion, is that if an error is made, debug it, don’t destroy the computer / host. This is why true reason is only applicable by the human being. Trial and error, leading to a just and universally fruitful end is purely rational. Being able to admit to the potential of mistake and then fixing the inevitable mistakes themselves, is the only reasonable solution. Great post!

“G”

]]> By: Lostcause http://probabilityfields.com/2007/02/02/setting-the-record-straight-about-robuts/comment-page-1/#comment-134 Lostcause Sat, 10 Feb 2007 06:42:11 +0000 http://probabilityfields.com/2007/02/02/setting-the-record-straight-about-robuts/#comment-134 Well actually, Kant probably stuck the toads up his ass for his daily walk. Well actually, Kant probably stuck the toads up his ass for his daily walk.

]]> By: Lostcause http://probabilityfields.com/2007/02/02/setting-the-record-straight-about-robuts/comment-page-1/#comment-133 Lostcause Sat, 10 Feb 2007 06:39:16 +0000 http://probabilityfields.com/2007/02/02/setting-the-record-straight-about-robuts/#comment-133 God damn it, I should read what I write and not write while watching kungfu! The above post should have read: Hegel and Kant both licked toads to get high. Interesting factoid - the word “Robot” originates from a Czech word that meant obligatory/slave/unpaid worker. So, are you saying we slaves to our own cliche spirit? Yeah, Yeah, Yeah - Robut not robot how c#@%^$. I'm going to go lick another toad! God damn it, I should read what I write and not write while watching kungfu!

The above post should have read:

Hegel and Kant both licked toads to get high.

Interesting factoid - the word “Robot” originates from a Czech word that meant obligatory/slave/unpaid worker.

So, are you saying we slaves to our own cliche spirit?

Yeah, Yeah, Yeah - Robut not robot how c#@%^$.

I’m going to go lick another toad!

]]> By: Lostcause http://probabilityfields.com/2007/02/02/setting-the-record-straight-about-robuts/comment-page-1/#comment-132 Lostcause Sat, 10 Feb 2007 06:36:06 +0000 http://probabilityfields.com/2007/02/02/setting-the-record-straight-about-robuts/#comment-132 There should be an "are" between "we" and "slaves" in the above post. There should be an “are” between “we” and “slaves” in the above post.

]]> By: Lostcause http://probabilityfields.com/2007/02/02/setting-the-record-straight-about-robuts/comment-page-1/#comment-131 Lostcause Sat, 10 Feb 2007 06:34:37 +0000 http://probabilityfields.com/2007/02/02/setting-the-record-straight-about-robuts/#comment-131 Hegel and Kant both licked toads to get high. Interesting factoid - the word "Robot" originates from a Czech obligatory/slave/unpaid worker. So, are you saying we slaves to our own cliche spirit? Yeah, Yeah, Yeah - Robut not robot how c#@%^$. Hegel and Kant both licked toads to get high.

Interesting factoid - the word “Robot” originates from a Czech obligatory/slave/unpaid worker.

So, are you saying we slaves to our own cliche spirit?

Yeah, Yeah, Yeah - Robut not robot how c#@%^$.

]]> By: doctor Boner http://probabilityfields.com/2007/02/02/setting-the-record-straight-about-robuts/comment-page-1/#comment-124 doctor Boner Fri, 02 Feb 2007 09:37:18 +0000 http://probabilityfields.com/2007/02/02/setting-the-record-straight-about-robuts/#comment-124 When you said, "Against cold rationality, the human spirit welcomes Multiplicity," I couldn't agree more. Did Michael Keaton get stiffed for that performance or what? By the way, I'm a boner doctor, and the robut in the picture should, uh, you know, come and, uh, get a check up. Sooner the better. (Okay you got me, I want to steal his boner and make it my own.) When you said, “Against cold rationality, the human spirit welcomes Multiplicity,” I couldn’t agree more. Did Michael Keaton get stiffed for that performance or what? By the way, I’m a boner doctor, and the robut in the picture should, uh, you know, come and, uh, get a check up. Sooner the better. (Okay you got me, I want to steal his boner and make it my own.)

]]>