<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for probabilityfields</title>
	<atom:link href="http://probabilityfields.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://probabilityfields.com</link>
	<description>aspiring TV writer. screenwriter. director. musician. statesman.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 04:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Bratwurst with Spinach &#038; Blueberries by Jeff</title>
		<link>http://probabilityfields.com/2008/08/12/bratwurst-with-spinach-blueberries/#comment-998</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 06:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probabilityfields.com/?p=193#comment-998</guid>
		<description>ah, dude, that looks ridiculously good. mmmmmmmmm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ah, dude, that looks ridiculously good. mmmmmmmmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on American Taxpayers: Proud Sponsor of the Bejing Olympics by danielle</title>
		<link>http://probabilityfields.com/2008/08/11/american-taxpayers-proud-sponsor-of-the-bejing-olympics/#comment-997</link>
		<dc:creator>danielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 22:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probabilityfields.com/?p=191#comment-997</guid>
		<description>interesting read - thanks for sharing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting read - thanks for sharing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sweet Find! (I&#8217;m so dark) by beau</title>
		<link>http://probabilityfields.com/2008/06/18/sweet-find-im-so-dark/#comment-996</link>
		<dc:creator>beau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 03:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probabilityfields.com/?p=179#comment-996</guid>
		<description>If I read it backwards it's Swedish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I read it backwards it&#8217;s Swedish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sweet Find! (I&#8217;m so dark) by Jeff</title>
		<link>http://probabilityfields.com/2008/06/18/sweet-find-im-so-dark/#comment-995</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 03:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probabilityfields.com/?p=179#comment-995</guid>
		<description>How Swedish of you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How Swedish of you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Suggestion for a new electoral process by DrRetarded</title>
		<link>http://probabilityfields.com/2008/06/04/suggestion-for-a-new-electoral-process/#comment-994</link>
		<dc:creator>DrRetarded</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 10:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probabilityfields.com/?p=173#comment-994</guid>
		<description>First of all, as a doctor, I believe that all degrees should be attained by a series of proficiency tests using a crystal ball.  Second, as far as an innovative new system of voting, I think you're on to something.  But it can be even more extreme and televise-able: The two presidential candidates should have a battle to the death in a cage filled with poisonous black adders, and hungry tigers, and homeless people.  That way none of the respectable American voters are diluted into thinking that their vote actually matters.  And besides, who can dispute that the candidate with the most tolerance for blood loss should not be kingshit of fuckmountain?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, as a doctor, I believe that all degrees should be attained by a series of proficiency tests using a crystal ball.  Second, as far as an innovative new system of voting, I think you&#8217;re on to something.  But it can be even more extreme and televise-able: The two presidential candidates should have a battle to the death in a cage filled with poisonous black adders, and hungry tigers, and homeless people.  That way none of the respectable American voters are diluted into thinking that their vote actually matters.  And besides, who can dispute that the candidate with the most tolerance for blood loss should not be kingshit of fuckmountain?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Suggestion for a new electoral process by Going Churching</title>
		<link>http://probabilityfields.com/2008/06/04/suggestion-for-a-new-electoral-process/#comment-993</link>
		<dc:creator>Going Churching</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probabilityfields.com/?p=173#comment-993</guid>
		<description>Hey!  I resemble that online degree in metaphysics remark!  And yes, it hold just as much weight as the hoity-toity Harvard philosophy degrees, at a fraction of the cost!  Plus, I mean, come on, who doesn't want a crystal ball with their degree!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey!  I resemble that online degree in metaphysics remark!  And yes, it hold just as much weight as the hoity-toity Harvard philosophy degrees, at a fraction of the cost!  Plus, I mean, come on, who doesn&#8217;t want a crystal ball with their degree!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is there any doubt? by Monz</title>
		<link>http://probabilityfields.com/2007/11/19/is-there-any-doubt/#comment-992</link>
		<dc:creator>Monz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 19:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probabilityfields.com/2007/11/19/is-there-any-doubt/#comment-992</guid>
		<description>You forgot to mention that he reproduced and Bridgette got herself all over national TV showing off her "Brady Bump". It disgusts me that so many kids look up to Brady and then he goes, knocks up some chick and it's all over TV like it's an OK thing to do.
Bastard child</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You forgot to mention that he reproduced and Bridgette got herself all over national TV showing off her &#8220;Brady Bump&#8221;. It disgusts me that so many kids look up to Brady and then he goes, knocks up some chick and it&#8217;s all over TV like it&#8217;s an OK thing to do.<br />
Bastard child</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OMFG, Christians are MEAN! by Going Churching</title>
		<link>http://probabilityfields.com/2008/05/05/omfg-christians-are-mean/#comment-989</link>
		<dc:creator>Going Churching</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 14:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probabilityfields.com/?p=164#comment-989</guid>
		<description>Holy shit.  Do you see the internal conflict that is held up inside the believer in modern Christianity.  That girl was scared shitless!  The fact that there are people that are afraid of this type of thing is really just sickening.  But, I would like to say... HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa!  That's what you get for believing in mystical bullshit!  Dumb, weak-minded bimbo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy shit.  Do you see the internal conflict that is held up inside the believer in modern Christianity.  That girl was scared shitless!  The fact that there are people that are afraid of this type of thing is really just sickening.  But, I would like to say&#8230; HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa!  That&#8217;s what you get for believing in mystical bullshit!  Dumb, weak-minded bimbo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Because the night&#8230; by tony</title>
		<link>http://probabilityfields.com/2008/04/19/because-the-night/#comment-988</link>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 10:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probabilityfields.com/?p=162#comment-988</guid>
		<description>Springsteen's alright, I guess, but I'm going to see Richard Cheese and Lounge against the Machine next Saturday....  But really, I envy you.  Springsteen's one of the few old schoolers who's not too geriatric to rock it proper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Springsteen&#8217;s alright, I guess, but I&#8217;m going to see Richard Cheese and Lounge against the Machine next Saturday&#8230;.  But really, I envy you.  Springsteen&#8217;s one of the few old schoolers who&#8217;s not too geriatric to rock it proper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Hillary Won by cb</title>
		<link>http://probabilityfields.com/2008/01/09/why-hillary-won/#comment-895</link>
		<dc:creator>cb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 08:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://probabilityfields.com/2008/01/09/why-hillary-won/#comment-895</guid>
		<description>Shaking head...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shaking head&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
